<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Sentence I&#8217;ve Read Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/10/13/best-sentence-ive-read-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/10/13/best-sentence-ive-read-today/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Pitt</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/10/13/best-sentence-ive-read-today/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Pitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=414#comment-524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fewer (explicit) assumptions, Yes!  

No assumptions, No!

And Josh, contrary to what those in the humanities and the social sciences think, their research projects, even if they believe they are producing &quot;grounded theory,&quot; are replete with (inexplicit) assumptions.  If they were not, they would not be able to sift between what data are significant, and what are not significant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fewer (explicit) assumptions, Yes!  </p>
<p>No assumptions, No!</p>
<p>And Josh, contrary to what those in the humanities and the social sciences think, their research projects, even if they believe they are producing &#8220;grounded theory,&#8221; are replete with (inexplicit) assumptions.  If they were not, they would not be able to sift between what data are significant, and what are not significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S Cook</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/10/13/best-sentence-ive-read-today/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John S Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=414#comment-523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Important issues are where do people get their information and how does information influence whatever they are prepared to believe. Since belief systems are endogenously determined, it might be a good place for economists to start in trying to understand economic systems. If maximising behaviour is an assumption and already decided, what is left to decide? How can they deal further with rationality and consumer choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important issues are where do people get their information and how does information influence whatever they are prepared to believe. Since belief systems are endogenously determined, it might be a good place for economists to start in trying to understand economic systems. If maximising behaviour is an assumption and already decided, what is left to decide? How can they deal further with rationality and consumer choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

