<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mistaking Effect for Cause</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/09/mistaking-effect-for-cause-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/09/mistaking-effect-for-cause-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 03:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Pitt</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/09/mistaking-effect-for-cause-2/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Pitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=483#comment-662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the plug KMcNeel!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the plug KMcNeel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K McNeel</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/09/mistaking-effect-for-cause-2/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K McNeel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=483#comment-661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is pretty interesting. There&#039;s been some work on whether legal realism (and other views of judicial decision-making) are adequate models of how judges make decisions. Here&#039;s the link to a paper by Giacomo Ponzetto and Patricio Fernandez, for example: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1116784]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pretty interesting. There&#8217;s been some work on whether legal realism (and other views of judicial decision-making) are adequate models of how judges make decisions. Here&#8217;s the link to a paper by Giacomo Ponzetto and Patricio Fernandez, for example: <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1116784" rel="nofollow">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1116784</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dain</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/09/mistaking-effect-for-cause-2/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=483#comment-594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Or, is this just another case of how empirical arguments, whether pro or anti, sustain the critique capitalism?&lt;/i&gt;

No more than non-empirical arguments do.

In this case it would seem Burczak is unaware of - or disagrees with - the empirical arguments found in, for example, How The West Grew Rich.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Or, is this just another case of how empirical arguments, whether pro or anti, sustain the critique capitalism?</i></p>
<p>No more than non-empirical arguments do.</p>
<p>In this case it would seem Burczak is unaware of &#8211; or disagrees with &#8211; the empirical arguments found in, for example, How The West Grew Rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

