<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Did You Handle Your First Rejection?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/19/how-did-you-handle-your-first-rejection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/19/how-did-you-handle-your-first-rejection/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Cohen</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/19/how-did-you-handle-your-first-rejection/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip Cohen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=514#comment-686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first rejection was really bad. But the next one was actually an R&amp;R, but I didn&#039;t get that far in the letter, so I thought it was a rejection. The editor said, &quot;I&#039;m sorry to tell you we won&#039;t be publishing your article. ... [how many they receive, specific problems, etc.] ... however, if you would like to revise and resubmit the article, we would be willing to consider it.&quot; I didn&#039;t notice till I showed it to someone standing in the mailroom and he pointed it out to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first rejection was really bad. But the next one was actually an R&amp;R, but I didn&#8217;t get that far in the letter, so I thought it was a rejection. The editor said, &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry to tell you we won&#8217;t be publishing your article. &#8230; [how many they receive, specific problems, etc.] &#8230; however, if you would like to revise and resubmit the article, we would be willing to consider it.&#8221; I didn&#8217;t notice till I showed it to someone standing in the mailroom and he pointed it out to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauro Mello Jr.</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/19/how-did-you-handle-your-first-rejection/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauro Mello Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=514#comment-664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should also check the link to a YouTube video — Peer Review 1945 —  posted on orgtheory.net about &#039;feeling cranky after getting some reviews&#039;:

http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/ever-feel-cranky-after-getting-some-reviews/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should also check the link to a YouTube video — Peer Review 1945 —  posted on orgtheory.net about &#8216;feeling cranky after getting some reviews&#8217;:</p>
<p><a href="http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/ever-feel-cranky-after-getting-some-reviews/" rel="nofollow">http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/ever-feel-cranky-after-getting-some-reviews/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshmccabe</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/19/how-did-you-handle-your-first-rejection/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshmccabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=514#comment-660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After I got my first rejection, I received consolation messages from four economist friends. I&#039;ll keep them anonymous...

Economist #1: &quot;If you can ship it off to another journal within seven days, you are a better man than I.&quot;

Economist #2: &quot;Journals send rejectons? What&#039;s that like?&quot;

Economist #3: &quot;Pin it to the wall with pride and then &quot;stick a stamp on it&quot; and send it out again.&quot;

Economist #4: &quot;Congratulations! You&#039;re on a path well-treaded by many famous writers.&quot;

I took #1&#039;s and #3&#039;s advice. I added a Stinchcombe quote (because Stinchcombe basically fixes everything) and sent it out again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After I got my first rejection, I received consolation messages from four economist friends. I&#8217;ll keep them anonymous&#8230;</p>
<p>Economist #1: &#8220;If you can ship it off to another journal within seven days, you are a better man than I.&#8221;</p>
<p>Economist #2: &#8220;Journals send rejectons? What&#8217;s that like?&#8221;</p>
<p>Economist #3: &#8220;Pin it to the wall with pride and then &#8220;stick a stamp on it&#8221; and send it out again.&#8221;</p>
<p>Economist #4: &#8220;Congratulations! You&#8217;re on a path well-treaded by many famous writers.&#8221;</p>
<p>I took #1&#8242;s and #3&#8242;s advice. I added a Stinchcombe quote (because Stinchcombe basically fixes everything) and sent it out again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

