<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adventures in Vulgar Marxism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/29/adventures-in-vulgar-marxism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/29/adventures-in-vulgar-marxism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshmccabe</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/29/adventures-in-vulgar-marxism/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshmccabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=529#comment-684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jake, that was an insightful comment but if you had not made it, then someone else would have in the long run.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, that was an insightful comment but if you had not made it, then someone else would have in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Roundtree</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2009/11/29/adventures-in-vulgar-marxism/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake Roundtree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=529#comment-667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll admit that I have never read anything by Bahm-Bawerk, nor am I aware of whether anyone else wrote an equally powerful critique of Marx&#039;s labor theory of value around that era , but Sweezy&#039;s argument seems stretched. Consider Hayek&#039;s failure to criticize Keynes&#039; General Theory, which Mises and many others certainly could have refuted. Plus the fact that the arguments Bahm-Bawerk levied against Marx&#039;s economics were widely accepted or known seems to say more about the weakness of Marx&#039;s economics then it does about the brilliance of Bahm-Bawerk&#039;s critique itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll admit that I have never read anything by Bahm-Bawerk, nor am I aware of whether anyone else wrote an equally powerful critique of Marx&#8217;s labor theory of value around that era , but Sweezy&#8217;s argument seems stretched. Consider Hayek&#8217;s failure to criticize Keynes&#8217; General Theory, which Mises and many others certainly could have refuted. Plus the fact that the arguments Bahm-Bawerk levied against Marx&#8217;s economics were widely accepted or known seems to say more about the weakness of Marx&#8217;s economics then it does about the brilliance of Bahm-Bawerk&#8217;s critique itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

