<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading vs. Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2010/01/21/reading-vs-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2010/01/21/reading-vs-writing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2010/01/21/reading-vs-writing/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=646#comment-933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel absolutely the same way as you, Josh.  I think early on it&#039;s important to wrestle with both learning how to adequately read and digest scholarly writing (because let&#039;s face it.. it&#039;s a little different than most &quot;other&quot; things we&#039;ll read) and to build up a solid foundation of the things you think you&#039;ll use later in your career.  

I like the point about having the best ideas when you&#039;re reading-- that happens to me too.  I don&#039;t know if this happens to anyone else, though... I always have a great idea, and then go to read the next article on my to-read list, and find that someone else has already explored my idea.  This leaves me with a two-fold feeling... 1) that at least I&#039;m on the right track with my ideas, and 2) that reading the literature is necessary in order to make a solid and non-repetitive contribution to scholarly knowledge.

So, long story short, I guess I would say read until you feel comfortable with the literature you&#039;re working with (and read/skim as much for class as you can, because it will allow you to survey many different areas) and then focus on writing once you&#039;re secure with the ideas.  Writing is essential to work at, too, as it&#039;s how we communicate with each other.. and there is a scholarly language that you need to utilize in order to communicate effectively.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel absolutely the same way as you, Josh.  I think early on it&#8217;s important to wrestle with both learning how to adequately read and digest scholarly writing (because let&#8217;s face it.. it&#8217;s a little different than most &#8220;other&#8221; things we&#8217;ll read) and to build up a solid foundation of the things you think you&#8217;ll use later in your career.  </p>
<p>I like the point about having the best ideas when you&#8217;re reading&#8211; that happens to me too.  I don&#8217;t know if this happens to anyone else, though&#8230; I always have a great idea, and then go to read the next article on my to-read list, and find that someone else has already explored my idea.  This leaves me with a two-fold feeling&#8230; 1) that at least I&#8217;m on the right track with my ideas, and 2) that reading the literature is necessary in order to make a solid and non-repetitive contribution to scholarly knowledge.</p>
<p>So, long story short, I guess I would say read until you feel comfortable with the literature you&#8217;re working with (and read/skim as much for class as you can, because it will allow you to survey many different areas) and then focus on writing once you&#8217;re secure with the ideas.  Writing is essential to work at, too, as it&#8217;s how we communicate with each other.. and there is a scholarly language that you need to utilize in order to communicate effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshmccabe</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2010/01/21/reading-vs-writing/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshmccabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=646#comment-856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think they&#039;re substitutes - more like complements. SUNY Albany gets you into the habit of writing short memos for everyone we read in class. I think this is great for forcing you to learn how to summarize and communicate main ideas in a concise way. 

But if I had to pick one or the other, I would lean toward reading early in grad school as a way to get to know your discipline beyond what your professors present to you in class.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re substitutes &#8211; more like complements. SUNY Albany gets you into the habit of writing short memos for everyone we read in class. I think this is great for forcing you to learn how to summarize and communicate main ideas in a concise way. </p>
<p>But if I had to pick one or the other, I would lean toward reading early in grad school as a way to get to know your discipline beyond what your professors present to you in class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis H Arroyo</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2010/01/21/reading-vs-writing/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis H Arroyo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=646#comment-852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is that I get the best ideas when I´m reading...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that I get the best ideas when I´m reading&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Per Bylund</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2010/01/21/reading-vs-writing/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Per Bylund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=646#comment-828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with David. You know a lot of stuff and have a lot of ideas - so write them down! You will probably notice that you need a reference here and there or perhaps a couple of references - that&#039;s the time to go to Google Scholar and find/read them. Not before.

Unless, of course, you are writing a literature review - then you need to have a general idea of what the literature is about as well as where to find it before you begin...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with David. You know a lot of stuff and have a lot of ideas &#8211; so write them down! You will probably notice that you need a reference here and there or perhaps a couple of references &#8211; that&#8217;s the time to go to Google Scholar and find/read them. Not before.</p>
<p>Unless, of course, you are writing a literature review &#8211; then you need to have a general idea of what the literature is about as well as where to find it before you begin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://thesociologicalimagination.com/2010/01/21/reading-vs-writing/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesociologicalimagination.com/?p=646#comment-827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should read only the very minimum necessary to write. One is paid to write, not read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should read only the very minimum necessary to write. One is paid to write, not read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

